Caring Wisely FY 2025 Project Contest

Decreasing avoidable hospital days for Medicine Team I long stay patients with neurocognitive and psychiatric disorders associated with behavioral disturbances who require psychiatric management

Proposal Status: 

PROJECT LEADS:  

  • Misti Meador, Assistant Director of Post Acute Care 
  • Manisha Israni-Jiang, MD, HS Clinical Professor, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Divisions of Hospital Medicine and Pediatrics, Assistant Medical Director, DHM Consult Services and Medicine Team I 

 

EXECUTIVE SPONSORS:  

  • Molly Shane, Executive Director of Care Management Patient Transitions 
  • Bradley Monash, MD, Vice Chief of Division of Hospital Medicine 

 

ABSTRACT – In 2023, Medicine Team Idocumented 424 avoidable days for patients awaiting psychiatric evaluations and interventions, which accounts for approximately 86% of the Medicine Team I censusMedicine Team I is proposing to staff a Per Diem UCSF Psychiatrist consultant assigned to their service to manage the non-emergent but labor-intensivepsychiatric evaluations, longitudinal medication management, and court petitions that can add unnecessary and avoidable days to a patient’s length of stay. 

 

 

UCSF TEAM 

  • Misti Meador, Assistant Director of Post Acute Care 
  • Kaitlin Dicks, Medicine I Case Manager 
  • Kelley Ogami, Medicine I Social Worker
  • Per Diem UCSF Psychiatrist  
  • Manisha Israni-Jiang,MD, Medicine I Assistant Medical Director 
  • Hugo Quinny Cheng, MD, Medicine I Medical Director 

 

 

PROBLEM– In 2023, a gap in access to psychiatric consultation resulted in424 avoidable hospital days for patients ona single medicine team. 86% of patients onMedicine Team Iaccounted for these avoidable days while theyawaited psychiatric evaluation, initiation of psychotropic treatment, and/ or court petition paperworkthat required completion by a psychiatrist, not including the delay in response by the courtsThese avoidable days equate to $784,400 spent in direct costs for providing care to patients who are not utilizing inpatient interventions ($1850/ day). Eliminating these 424 avoidable days can create significant capacity at Parnassus. We estimate the medical center could admit 59 additional patients over a 12-month period at Parnassus Heights. 59 additional patients can generate approximately $1,024,299 in income (average contributions margin by Hospital Medicine case is $17, 361).  

BACKGROUND: Medicine Team I is an inpatient service at Parnassus Heights for patients whose acute medical needs have resolved but have a prolonged length of stay (average LOS 75.59 days)due to discharge barriers related to behavioral disturbances, grave disability or placement. 86% of Team I patients have a neurocognitive or mental health disorder with associated severe behavioral disturbances which require regular evaluations, recommendationsand treatment by a psychiatrist.  

Psychiatric management of these patients is labor intensive requiring frequent evaluations, psychotropic medication adjustments, capacity assessments, and regular multidisciplinary rounding to address safety and treatment concerns. Many also require a psychiatrist to complete court petitions for conservatorship and/or medical procedures and to attend related court hearings. These behavioral disturbances when untreated also pose a safety risk for the patients themselves and staff. In some instances, staff have been seriously injured and patients have died. (insert WPV data here once obtained) 

Currently, the UCSF Psychiatry Consultation and Liaison (Psych CL) team serves as the consulting service for all Adult Services (Excluding L&D and Mother and Baby services). Withthe current staffingof 1.9 FTE for an estimated 5383 consults in the current fiscal year, there is limitedcapacity for their daily consult census of 30-40 patients. ED and new inpatient consults with acute psychosis and behavioral crisesare prioritized over consultations for longitudinal psychiatric medication management and equivocal decisional capacityassessments. 14-24 patients are not being seen daily, there is little continuity of care due to different attendings on different days and huddles & complex disposition take 5 hours/ week minimum.  

We demonstrated 424 avoidable inpatient days for the Team I patients in the calendar year 2023 while they awaited these nonacute longitudinal and court-petition-related psychiatry consultations, not including the days awaiting the court response back. 

In addition, in January 2024, Senate Bill 43 (SB43) was passed which expands the criteria for grave disability to include personal safety and necessary medical care and allows for conservatorship of patients with substance use disorders. The passing of SB43 is expected to increase the number of patients hospitalized with psychiatric and substance use disorders while they await conservatorship. As this inpatient volume increases, services like Medicine Team I can expect their avoidable days and length of stay to proportionately increase if no intervention is put in place to support the psychiatric needs of these vulnerable patients. 

 

TARGET– Our goal is to reduce the avoidable days related to delays in psychiatric treatments, evaluations, and court proceedings over a 12-month periodby 50% as compared to calendar year 2023 for Medicine Team I patients who have asevere mental health or neurocognitive disorder associated with behavioral disturbances. 

With a reduction in avoidable days, we expect a related decrease in stay length (LOS), direct costs, and workplace violence incidents. While difficult to measure in this target population (patients with severe mental health and neurocognitive disorders), it can be assumed that a decrease in unnecessary hospitals days would improve the patient’s experience, as many of these patients suffer the negative mental, physical, and emotional impacts of prolonged social isolation that can occur in an acute inpatient hospital. 

 

GAPSThere are multiple barriers to care of patients with neurocognitive or mental health disorders with behavioral disturbances.Using the Fishbone Gap analysis tool, we identified some root causes in various categories of: 

PEOPLE:  

  • PATIENTS in our target population are vulnerable due to their cognitive impairment, age and psychosocial barriers. Many have substance use or mental health disorders and are often homeless without support for medication management and activities of daily living support. There is an expected increase in the number of hospitalized patients requiring psychiatric evaluations, treatments and conservatorship, based on the new Senate Bill 43 
  • HOSPITALISTS are not sufficiently trained or experienced in the care of patients with primary psychiatric or advanced neurocognitive disorders or management of behavioral agitation. Team I has a dedicated case manager and social worker who are specialized in the transitions of care of our target population.   
  • PSYCHIATRY CL SERVICE is significantly short-staffed, decreasing the availability of consulting inpatient providers. The service has limited capacity for their daily consult census of 30-40 patients. ED and new inpatient consultations with acute psychosis and behavioral crises must be prioritized over consultations such as longitudinal psychiatric medication management and equivocal decisional capacity assessments which are required for patients with behavioral disturbances related to neurocognitive or psychiatric disorder. There is little continuity of care due to different attendings on different days. Psychiatry is hiring more faculty and moonlighters with the structure of consult assignment still to be determined.
ENVIRONMENT: Our acute medical units are not conducive to the care of the elderly, cognitively impaired or patients with mental health disorders. Being restricted to their rooms due to the concern of elopement or harm to staff or themselves can contribute to their agitation. 
 
METHODS: The legal process of conservatorship or MediCal insurance acquisition is long drawn and a systems issue outside the scope of UCSF Health 
 
MATERIALS: There is reduced availability of inpatient psychiatric beds and community resources especially for uninsured or MediCal patients. Notably, the closure of Laguna Honda Hospital has displaced several such patients 

 

INTERVENTIONBased on our root causes, we are choosing to focus on a countermeasure related to the shortage of longitudinal inpatient psychiatric consultation for the Medicine Team I patients.  

We propose to staff a Per Diem UCSF Psychiatrist consultant 6 hours a week for 12 months specifically assigned to Medicine Team I. This Team I assigned psychiatrist would  

  • Provide consultation on Team I patients who require routine and longitudinal psychiatric evaluations 
  • Guide psychotropic medication adjustments for patients with severe behavioral disturbances 
  • Perform mental capacity evaluations for patients suspected of grave disability 
  • Partake inregular multidisciplinary rounding to address safety and treatment concerns.  
  • Conduct evaluations needed to complete court petitions for psychiatric and/or probate conservatorship and/or medical procedures 
  • Attend related court hearings 

The psychiatrist consultant would be available longitudinally to evaluate patients already assigned to Medicine Team I (Daily census of 7 patients) and Medicine I waitlist patients (On average, waitlist is 2-5 patients awaiting transfer to Medicine Team I).   

Psych CL is actively hiring more faculty and moonlighters. A per diem faculty credentialled through the division of Psychiatry would serve as the assigned psychiatrist for the team I patients  

The intention of having an assigned Per Diem Psychiatrist to Medicine Team I is to provide continuity of care for the longitudinal needs of these patients, avoid delays due to competing with new psychiatry consults for their psychiatric evaluations, which cause delays in discharge. Additionally, these delays create health inequities, as this population of patients experiences delays in treatment and experiences the negative effects of prolonged social isolation. In some cases, patients have died while hospitalizedbecause of progressive deterioration while in isolation.  

This intervention is intended to close the gap on these inequities by adding consistent psychiatric support to expedite evaluations to reduce delays in decision-making and treatments. While there is internal interest in the UCSF Per Diem Psychiatrist position, there is a potential barrier of not being able to staff this rotation consistently every week. Additionally, there may be some role confusion between the Medicine Team I Psychiatrist position and the Psychiatric CL service. However, these barriers and the adverse impacts on the service and its patients can be avoided with a detailed staffing/coverage plan and scope of work for this new position developed in collaboration with the Hospital Medicine and Psychiatric CL leadership teams.  

 

PROPOSED EHR MODIFICATIONS 

  • Build an Apex report to track avoidable days entered by Team I case manager and social worker. 
  • In the current state, avoidable days are entered and calculated into a bed days table in Apex, but there is no reporting feature, so days must be calculated manually.  
  • If built, this report has the potential to help other services identifycost-saving opportunities and measure the impact of other quality improvement projects.  

 

RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI)

Improve Hospital Throughput and Reduce Excess Inpatient Bed Days

  • Direct Cost SavingsThe direct cost for caring for patients not utilizing inpatient interventions is estimated at $1850/day. In the424 avoidable days calculated in 2023, we estimated a direct cost of$784,400. If we meet the settarget of 50% reduction in avoidable days (~212 days), we estimate a directcost savings opportunity of $392,200 over a 12-month period 
  • Increase New Admission revenue: Eliminating these avoidable days can create significant capacity at Parnassus, potentially T/Q beds. By eliminating our calculated avoidable days, the medical center is estimated to be ablet to admit 59 additional patients over a 12-month period at Parnassus Heights, which in turn has the potential to generate ~$1,024,299 in income (average contributions margin by Hospital Medicine case is $17,361). 

Non-financial/other benefits of this project would include:

  • Improve Inpatient Access to Care: Decrease the delay in careof patients awaiting stabilization from a psychostroc and behavioral standpoint. 
  • Improved patient outcomes, safety and experience: While difficult to measure in this target population (patients with severe mental health and neurocognitive disorders), it can be assumed that a decrease in unnecessary hospitals days would improve the patient’s experience, as many of these patients suffer the negative mental, physical, and emotional impacts of prolonged social isolation that can occur in an acute inpatient hospital 
  • Increased staff and provider satisfaction and safety (e.g. decreased Workplace Violence incidents related to patients with behavioral disturbances) 

 

SUSTAINABILITY– If successful, a proposal outlining the ROI and qualitative outcomes of this project will be prepared for executive leadership within the Division of Hospital Medicine and Adult Services to request that UCSF Per Diem Psychiatrist hours be budgeted in the upcoming fiscal year to support this vulnerable Hospital Medicine population and the staff who care for them.This program could also serve as the model for expansion of limited but dedicated psychiatric consultation at our other campuses. This would support our strategic expansion of care of hospital medicine patients at our recently acquired campuses especially our long stay patients who donot require other tertiary or quaternary specialty care and are currently occupying a bed at Parnassus Heights.   

 

BUDGET ($50,000) – UCSF Per Diem Psychiatrist hourly rate = $160. Estimate of 6 hours per week (based on current Medicine Team I demand) for 12 months = $49,920.This per Diem position would not require paid benefits.Anticipate reporting and supply costs covered by Adult Case Management and External Care Cost Centers, as part of CARTDash implementation.  

 

Comments

I am very much in favour of this urgently needed service to support the DHM physicians, nurses and staff to care for an incredibly underserved and marginalised group of patients And get them to the places that they need to be for ongoing care. 

Thank you for submitting this proposal! As noted above, this would be a win-win-win for our patients, medicine service (physicians, nurses, social workers, case managers), and would support a significantly overstretched psychiatry consult & liaison service. 

I am in total agreement that this is an important proposal that should be prioritized.

This is a fantastic and compelling proposal -- there is a clear opportunity to reduce unnecessary hospital bed day for this group of patients, and you have proposed a clear and impactful intervention. 

This is a thoughtful and compelling proposal that addresses a deep-seated challenge that has profound negative impacts on the patient and provider experience in addition to hospital-based metrics such as length-of-stay. Would whole heartedly recommend!! 

This is an important intervention for helping a vulnerable population access the care they need within our system.  Great work!

This intervention is greatly needed, both for our patients and for our healthcare teams, for whom a dearth of psychiatric services have quantifiable negative impacts. An important and impactful proposal!

Manisha & Misti - this sounds a much needed intervention. I think it would be helpful to get buy-in and feedback from the Department of Psychiatry, as it seems like the biggest barrier to expanded access to their service is reported to be provider availability rather than money.

This is a wonderful proposal that would help support a well identified gap in the care of our patients. The expansion of the multidisciplinary team to support this complex patient population is so needed!

This is a much needed intervention for Med I and seems very impactful. 

Incredibly important project to be of service to some of the most vulnerable psychiatric patients in the UCSF hospital system. I would love to support it in any way possible!

This looks great!!! definitely would benefit the patients that I see that I know are going to eventually be under the care of team I. thanks for your thought on this.