PROJECT LEAD(S): Minso Kim, Sandra Staveski, Lori Fineman, Amy McCammond
EXECUTIVE SPONSOR(S): Shannon Fitzpatrick, MS, RN, CCRN, Patient Care Director, Pediatric Critical Care. University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Benioff Children’s Hospital (BCH) Mission Bay
ABSTRACT (1490 characters): Effective comfort management in children following heart surgery is crucial to successful recovery. Complex symptoms, neurodevelopmental variation, and a diverse care team can contribute to inconsistent care delivery. Further complicating care, important interactions exist among pain, agitation, delirium, and iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) and the cardiac system function. A standard approach to pain and sedation following child heart surgery has been shown to improve outcomes, decrease total exposure to opioid and sedative medications, enhance throughput, and reduce hospital length of stay (LOS). Our interprofessional team in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (PCICU) developed a unique, goal-directed, nurse-implemented pain and sedation algorithm and complementary Advancing Patient-Centered Excellence (APeX) order set, based on published and validated algorithms. Our algorithm aims to improve efficacy in achieving adequate comfort in postoperative child heart surgery patients as measured by clinical outcomes as well as by family feedback. It also aims to reduce children’s total cumulative exposure to opioid and sedative medications. Clinical and pharmacologic data for the 12-month period prior to implementation will be compared to data collected at 6- and 9-months post-implementation. Finally, measures of team communication, performance, and satisfaction related to pain and sedation management will be examined by a pre- and post-implementation survey.
TEAM: Sandra Staveski PhD, RN, CPNP-AC, FAAN; Lori D. Fineman, RN, MS, CNS; Brianna Rojo, RN, MSN, CNS; Tommy Flynn, PhD, RN, CPNP-AC; Minso Kim, MD, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics; Michael Cisco, MD, Associate Professor; Amy McCammond, MD, Associate Professor of Pediatrics; Lulu Jin, Pharm.D., BCPPS, BCPS, Pediatric Clinical Pharmacy Supervisor.
PROBLEM: Lowest effective dose of opioids and sedative agents is a strategic goal in critical care to optimize outcomes. However, ensuring adequate comfort in children with heart disease is complex process and remains elusive.1 Valentine and colleagues revealed a lack of standardized comfort care and use of sedation protocols in PCICUs including in UCSF BCH PCICU.2 There are multiple symptoms such as pain, agitation, under- and over-sedation, delirium, and IWS that overlap with each other. Teasing these symptoms out can be a subjective and challenging process. A pre-implementation survey in our PCICU team showed poor consistency among interprofessional clinicians as multiple team members had differing approaches. Moreover, practice variability among nurses based on expertise, beliefs, and clinical practice can add to the wide range of opioid and sedative use. We identified issues in the categories below:
Patients. Our patient population contains a high percentage of neonates, infants, and neurodevelopmentally divergent patients with impaired verbal communication who require developmentally appropriate approaches to pain and sedation assessment and management. This population benefits the most from evidence-based medication choice to maximize their potential brain development. Exposure to benzodiazepine in infancy is associated with impaired brain development suggested by hippocampal growth alteration implicated in memory processing.3 Use of prolonged continuous ketamine infusions may be associated with increased delirium.4 Children who were exposed to higher doses and longer durations of opioid and sedative medications are at a greater risk for IWS and delirium.5 Conversely, children exposed to lower doses and shorter durations of sedative medications are at a lower risk for sedation-related complications.6 We theorize that our work will not only be fiscally responsible but also add crucial information to the current medical literature. Our algorithm focuses on interprofessional goal setting as well as standardized weaning method for children exposed to opioids, benzodiazepines, and other sedative agents after heart surgery. We hypothesize that these focuses will reduce IWS, subsequently improving parental perception of the pain and sedation management.
Process. Clinical variability impacts infants, children, and adolescents differently. For example, a clinical team may be able to verbally communicate with and support a well-developed adolescent through critical illness in comparison to consoling those who lack verbal communication skills due to their age or neurodivergence. While there is a paucity of unifying practice guidance,6 a nurse-implemented, goal-directed, child-centric strategy to improve comfort in PCICU is possible and safe to use.7 Similarly, another study of nurse-implemented, goal-directed sedation strategy found a reduction in LOS and cumulative exposure to benzodiazepines.8
Systems. Children with agitation, inadequate sedation, poor pain control, delirium or IWS have higher nursing workload and require more 1:1 staffing.5 Having sedative medication guidelines is associated with reduced ICU and hospital LOS, decreased occurrence of delirium, shorter length of mechanical ventilation, less exposure to opioid and sedatives, decreased occurrence of IWS, and improved communication and documentation of sedative goals.1,5 Importantly, these positive changes were without an increase in adverse events.7 We hypothesize that financial metrics associated with implementing CICU Comfort Algorithm will decrease total exposure to opioid and sedatives, decrease hours on ventilator, reduce LOS, and improved throughput thereby reducing financial burden and sedation-related complications.
TARGETS: We will evaluate metrics important to each of our goals detailed below, comparing our baseline PCICU data (12-month period pre-implementation) with post-implementation data at 6- and 9-month timepoints (related to 1 year study period).
- Increase PCICU’s effectiveness in achieving adequate pain relief and appropriate sedation based on acuity for infants and children (0-18 years old) recovering from heart surgery as reflected by clinical outcomes and family feedback. While complex and multidimensional, we plan to evaluate several specific metrics to reflect this. We will evaluate total mechanical ventilation days, ICU LOS and total hospital LOS, aiming for an overall 5% decrease in each endpoint. At baseline, our patients recovering from heart surgery have median 3.2 mechanical ventilation days, median 11.7 ICU LOS, and median 18.0 hospital LOS. There were total 342 heart surgery cases at BCH Mission Bay PCICU in the past 12 calendar months. We will gather comfort scores from our electronic Health Record (EHR) pre- and post-implementation as balancing measures. In addition, we will evaluate post-discharge family survey data (Press Gainey Survey) regarding parental response to the questions “How well your child’s pain was controlled in the first 24 hours following surgery” and “How well your child’s pain was addressed.” We will aim for a 5% increase in families responding “Good” or “Very Good” to these questions at the 6- and 9-month time points. Currently our baseline Press Gainey scores for FY2024 are 95.3 for the question “how well my child’s pain was addressed”.
- Successfully implement our comfort algorithm in > 75% of children 0-18 years old recovering from heart surgery in the PCICU (excluding those who have undergone ventricular assist device (VAD) placement, heart transplant and/or palliative/comfort care), with equitable application of algorithm in children across all racial and ethnic backgrounds. This will be assessed by auditing utilization of the associated comfort algorithm APeX order set in comparison to unit admission and demographic data. We will further audit compliance with specific components of our algorithm using our audit tool developed in conjunction with UCSF Health regulatory team for appropriateness and sustainability. We will perform subgroup analysis to ensure that our algorithm is being applied equitably to children from all racial and ethnic backgrounds.
- Reduce total cumulative exposure (both exposure and duration) to opioid and sedation medications by 10% for each medication class. We will collect both pre- and post-implementation data regarding total cumulative exposure and total duration of treatment for all opioid and sedative medications for postoperative children while in our PCICU. Additionally, we will collect data on number of patients continuing to wean from opioid and sedative medications at hospital discharge.
- Demonstrate a 10 % improvement in our PCICU team’s assessment of our effectiveness, consistency, and communication surrounding pain and sedation management. We have previously conducted an interprofessional survey to assess each team member’s satisfaction with communication and team function related to the assessment and treatment of pain and agitation in children recovering from heart surgery. We will re-administer this survey at 6- and 9-month time points post-implementation.
GAPS: Analgesia and sedation are important parts of effective postoperative recovery in children after heart surgery ages 0-18 years old. Various system issues, technological boundaries, and educational gaps make the selection and titration of analgesic and sedating agents challenging. Children requiring heart surgery consists of a wide range of ages, developmental, and genetic variations. Their clinical acuities complicate the differentiation between the symptoms of impaired organ function and pain, agitation, delirium, and IWS. Variable clinical staff education, experience, and resource availability create inconsistencies in both the assessment and treatment of comfort from day to day. The lack of a standard approach to guide clinical processes related to ordering and administering analgesics and sedatives is a key gap that, when bridged, has been shown to facilitate improved outcomes as described above.
INTERVENTION:
1. Our interprofessional working group has developed an algorithm to standardize analgesia and sedation in our PCICU. Our algorithm was based upon published analgesia and sedation algorhithms,7,9 which was modified to reflect local practices and preferences. Briefly, our algorithm provides preferred medication choices, starting dosages, and instructions for increasing or decreasing medication dose as needed based on level of sedation or pain agreed upon during daily rounds. Our algorithm specifies the method of assessing level of sedation to improve consistency; a goal sedation level is set by our medical team, and the medication doses are titrated by our clinical nurses to achieve and maintain that specified comfort level. Additionally, our algorithm includes a standardized approach to weaning from analgesic and sedative medications to prevent IWS. Our algorithm will be applied uniformly to all PCICU surgical patients (0-18 years old) except for VAD placement, heart transplant, or comfort care patients. To ensure there are no equity gaps, we will measure adherence to our algorithm and compare rates among different subgroups.
2. Our algorithm will be implemented in our PCICU at BCH Mission Bay for children between 0-18 years of age. We care for approximately 500 patients per year, ranging in age from newborn to adult. All patients having surgery will be managed with our algorithm. Our medical staff consists of 12 attending physicians, 8 Nurse Practitioners, and fellows from our Pediatric Cardiology and Critical Care fellowship training programs. Approximately 120 nurses staff our unit.
3. We anticipate our largest barrier to implementation will be faculty, trainee, and staff education that are sustained over time. We will approach this using multiple strategies, including electronic dissemination of our algorithm, reviewing our algorithm in person at staff meetings, online training modules, and utilizing staff champions to provide in person assistance.
4. Potential adverse outcomes that we will track include unplanned extubation and hemodynamic instability due to suboptimal sedation or analgesia. Patient/caregiver satisfaction is also tracked in post-discharge surveys. Similar algorithms have been studied in pediatric critical care units, and these studies suggest that an algorithm can provide clinical benefits without significant adverse outcomes.
PROPOSED EHR MODIFICATIONS: Effective and efficient application of technological resources is key to progressive quality improvement projects. Utilizing existing tools and workflows from UCSF Health’s EHR record system (APeX), this project proposal includes development of an algorithm-based order set and an algorithm-specific APeX report. Providers use order sets in APeX to place interdependent orders efficiently while, in this case, consistently adhering to algorithm directives. APeX reports are generated from existing data in our EHR and can be used to monitor various clinical processes and phenomena. We have been working with EHR leaders to modify orders.
RETURN ON INVESTMENT: In 2024, patients who were admitted under pediatric cardiothoracic surgical service had an average 5.5 day of ICU LOS. The direct cost portion of ICU LOS is estimated at $5,500 per day. We aim to decrease the ICU LOS by 5% (0.3 days) by implementing our project. Our estimated annual surgical volume is 300 patients excluding VAD placement or heart transplant patients. If we successfully implement CICU Comfort Algorithm in 75% of this population, this will equate to 225 patients. This will translate to direct cost savings of $371,250 per year. Additionally, this decreased ICU LOS will open up 56 ICU patient days per year to admit more patients for cardiac surgery, which will further generate revenue in return.
SUSTAINABILITY: Our algorithm will be embedded in our broader PCICU management of postoperative children and will involve ongoing annual re-education, mandatory orientation and maintenance of competencies. Longitudinal interprofessional working group will continue to monitor our project and outcomes moving forward.
BUDGET:
- We request $10,000 for data extraction by Clinical Translation Science Institute (CTSI) [including medication duration, cumulative doses of opioid, benzodiazepine, dexmedetomidine, propofol, ketamine, total ventilator days, LOS, discharge home on methadone, lorazepam, or clonidine, and parent satisfaction measures.
- We wish for $10,000 for our PCICU Pharmacist salary and fringe for supervising data verification and analysis by School of Pharmacy graduate research students and/or work study students.
- We request $15,000 for data collection, verification, management, and cleaning by graduate pharmacy, work study students and/or nursing student researcher. Graduate PharmD students will verify 10% of data extracted by CTSI.
- We wish for $5,000 for PCICU clinical nurse champions to aide in staff education and/or implementation support during our study proposal timeframe.
- We request $10,000 salary and fringe support for proposal and study planning, oversight and statistical support by Dr. Staveski and statistical support from UCSF SON statistician and/or graduate research student.
REFERENCES:
- Balit CR, LaRosa JM, Ong JSM, Kudchadkar SR. Sedation protocols in the pediatric intensive care unit: fact or fiction? Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2814-2824.
- Valentine K, Cisco MJ, Lasa JJ, Achuff BJ, Kudchadkar SR, Staveski SL. A survey of current practices in sedation, analgesia, withdrawal, and delirium management in paediatric cardiac ICUs. Cardiol Young. 2023 Nov;33(11):2209-2214.
- Duerden EG, Guo T, Chau C, Chau V, Synnes A, Grunau RE, Miller SP. Association of Neonatal Midazolam Exposure with Hippocampal Growth and Working Memory Performance in Children Born Preterm. Neurology. 2023 Nov 7;101(19):e1863-e1872.
- Da Silva PSL, Kubo EY, da Motta Ramos Siqueira R, Fonseca MCM. Impact of Prolonged Continuous Ketamine Infusions in Critically Ill Children: A Prospective Cohort Study. Paediatr Drugs. 2024 Sep;26(5):597-607.
- Best KM, Asaro LA, Franck LS, Wypij D, Curley MA; Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure Baseline Study Investigators. Patterns of Sedation Weaning in Critically Ill Children Recovering from Acute Respiratory Failure. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):19-29.
- Poh YN, Poh PF, Buang SN, Lee JH. Sedation guidelines, protocols, and algorithms in PICUs: a systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov;15(9):885-92.
- Lincoln PA, Whelan K, Hartwell LP, Gauvreau K, Dodsen BL, LaRovere JM, Thiagarajan RR, Hickey PA, Curley MAQ. Nurse-Implemented Goal-Directed Strategy to Improve Pain and Sedation Management in a Pediatric Cardiac ICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;21(12):1064-1070. Erratum in: Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):e164.
- Hanser A, Neunhoeffer F, Hayer T, Hofbeck M, Schlensak C, Mustafi M, Kumpf M, Michel J. A nurse-driven analgesia and sedation protocol reduces length of PICU stay and cumulative dose of benzodiazepines after corrective surgery for tetralogy of Fallot. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Jul;25(3):e12291.
- Curley MAQ, Gedeit RG, Dodson BL, Amling JK, Soetenga DJ, Corriveau CO, Asario LA, Wypij D; RESTORE Investigative Team. Methods in the design and implementation of the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) clinical trial. Trials. 2018 Dec 17;19(1):687. Erratum in: Trials. 2019 Jan 7;20(1):17. Asaro, Lisa A [corrected to Asario, Lisa A].
Comments
Wonderful work, Team! Looking
Wonderful work, Team! Looking forward to comments and feedback from our peers!
Thank you for submitting this
Thank you for submitting this compelling proposal. Are you able to provide estimates of baseline measures (with variability) related to #1 above (pain relief, intubation days, LOS, etc)? This will help estimate how many patients/time and effect size detection will be possible in your evaluation.
Thank you for the valuable
Thank you for the valuable feedback. With regards to the clinical outcomes, our data is tracked through our unit’s participation in the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4), a multi-center data repository and quality improvement collaborative. Over the past 12 calendar months there have been a total of 342 heart surgery cases at BCH-SF. Acknowledging the considerable variation in patient characteristics and complexity of heart surgeries, during this period our collective population of patients recovering from heart surgery had a median mechanical ventilation duration of 3.23 days, median ICU length of stay of 11.7 days and median hospital length of stay of 18 days. With regards to families’ perception of adequacy of pain relief, our baseline Press Gainey score for the question “how well my child’s pain was addressed” was quite favorable at 95.3 for FY 24. We are in the process of obtaining the baseline pediatric cardiac surgical service-line data related to pain control for the first 24 hours, and we aim to see an improvement in both scores post-implementation. Baseline individual pain scores as documented in APEX have not yet been obtained. We plan to include this as part of the APEX data collection that would be supported by this proposal.
Thank you for your submission
Thank you for your submission of this excellent proposal. I have a few comments and questions.
1) It would be very helpful if you could post your proposed new algorithm that you have developed and are in the process of building EHR ordersets for, or if you could describe more in-depth what this new protocol is, who would be doing what and when, and how this is different from the current state. I'm trying to better understand how the new algorithm will help address the existing implementation gaps listed in your proposal.
2) I understand wanting to pilot this new algorithm for pain and sedation at BCH-SF first. What would the opporutunities be to scale this algorithm beyond the BCH-SF PCICU? Could this be scaled to the PICU? BCH-Oakland?
3) How would Caring Wisely specifically support this program that would be different than existing operations improvement at the PCICU? Or will the support be substantially augmentative to boost the feasibility of implementation?
1) We would be happy to share
1) We would be happy to share the algorithm. I will try to add an copy of it here, but please let us know if there is an easier way to post it. There are a number of aspects in the algorithm that are different. One of the most significant is to enable the bedside nurses to adjust doses of sedative and analgesic infusions based on pain and agitation scores. The algorithm also has built-in mechanisms to ensure that we use the lowest effective doses of comfort medications, which should decrease overall exposure to opioids and sedatives and reduce iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome. Also, the algorithm introduces a greater degree of standardization to our practice compared to what is currently done. This should specifically reduce the dissatisfaction and inconsistency that sometimes occurs when the management approach is changed (which medications are used, how doses are adjusted, how medications ae weaned, etc.) with changes in staffing.
Early Extubation Algorithm
2
Analgesia:
Goal pain score < 4
Start around-the-clock non-opioid analgesics:
- Acetaminophen† 15 mg/kg IV/PO Q6 hours x 4 doses – do not exceed 75 mg/kg/day or 4 grams/day
- Consider ketorolac†* (see note below) 0.5 mg/kg IV Q6 hours (max 30 mg/dose) x 8 doses (max 3 days if < 2 years old; max 5 days if ≥ 2 years old).
o NOTE: Ketorolac is limited to patients ≥ 3 months of age (CGA>45 weeks) with normal renal function, minimal risk for bleeding, chest tube output < 3 mL/kg/hour, and CT Surgery approval for NSAIDs. NSAIDs are contraindicated in patients post-transplant or post-VAD placement.
†Route: Start with IV dosing and transition to enteral acetaminophen or NSAID dosing as soon as able (tolerating enteral medications per current diet order).
*Scheduling: Alternate administration schedule so that either acetaminophen or ketorolac is given Q3 hours.
Give PRN opioid if patient’s pain score ≥ 4 after comfort measures have been provided. Morphine and Hydromorphone are first line agents for patients who are extubated:
- Morphine 0.03 - 0.05 mg/kg/dose IV Q10 minutes until acute pain relieved (max 3 doses). Follow with morphine Q1 hour PRN pain (usual max 2 - 4 mg/dose). NOTE: In patients with prior opioid exposure, consider increased dosing of 0.1 - 0.2 mg/kg/dose
OR
- Fentanyl 0.5 - 1 mcg/kg/dose IV Q10 minutes until pain relieved (max 3 doses). Follow with fentanyl Q1 hour PRN pain (usual max 50 mcg/dose). Potential for rigid chest syndrome – use with caution in extubated patients.
OR
- Hydromorphone (for patients over 12 months of age)
o Patients weighing < 30 kg, administer hydromorphone 0.01 - 0.03 mg/kg/dose IV Q10 minutes until pain relieved (max 3 doses). Follow with hydromorphone 0.01 - 0.03 mg/kg/dose Q1 hour PRN pain (usual max 0.3 - 0.5 mg/dose).
o For patients weighing ≥ 30 kg, administerhydromorphone 0.3 - 0.5 mg/dose IV Q10 minutes until acute pain relieved (max 3 doses), then follow with hydromorphone 0.3 - 0.5 mg/dose Q1 hour PRN pain
3
Sedation:
Goal SBS -1 to 0
If patient’s SBS is > 0 and not responsive to comfort measures and PRN analgesia, start or adjust dexmedetomidine infusion:
- Dexmedetomidine 0.2 – 0.5 mcg/kg/hr IV. May be adjusted in increments of 0.1 – 0.3 mcg/kg/hr q30 minutes PRN agitation. Usual max dose 1.5 mcg/kg/hr.
- Non-standard option: Propofol infusion starting dose 25-50 mcg/kg/min, max dose 100 mcg/kg/min. May be considered in patients ≥ 12 months old with good ventricular function.
4
When patient is ready for extubation, discontinue opioid infusion. Dexmedetomidine infusion may be continued in certain cases based on clinical need.
5
AFTER EXTUBATION:
RESTORE-Cardiac
Nurse-Implemented Goal-Directed Comfort Algorithm
(Page 1 of 3 – Short term)
Remain Intubated Algorithm
7
Analgesia
Goal pain score < 4
Continue or start an opioid infusion - the following are typical starting doses:
- Fentanyl at 0.5 mcg/kg/hour IV (max starting dose 1 mcg/kg/hour)
- The team may choose an alternative opioid
o Morphine, start at 0.03 mg/kg/hour (max starting dose 0.05 mg/kg/hour)
o Hydromorphone, start at 7 mcg/kg/hour (max starting dose 10 mcg/kg/hour)
Administer PRN opioid for pain score ≥ 4
For analgesia, PRN agent/dose may match the continuous infusion agent and dose.
- For neonates, the max starting dose for PRN fentanyl is 0.5 mcg/kg/dose in the post-operative period, monitoring for hypotension.
Start around-the-clock non-opioid analgesics:
- Acetaminophen† 15 mg/kg IV/PO Q6 hours x 4 doses – do not exceed 75 mg/kg/day or 4 grams/day
- Ketorolac†* (see notes below) 0.5 mg/kg IV Q6 hours (max 30 mg/dose) x 8 doses (max 3 days if < 2 years old; max 5 days if ≥ 2 years old).
NOTE: Ketorolac is limited to patients ≥ 3 months of age (CGA>45 weeks) with normal renal function, minimal risk for bleeding, chest tube output < 3 mL/kg/hour, and CT Surgery approval for NSAIDs. NSAIDs are contraindicated in patients post-transplant or post-VAD placement.
†Route: Start with IV dosing and transition to enteral Acetaminophen or NSAID dosing as soon as able (tolerating enteral medications per current diet order).
*Scheduling: Alternate administration schedule so that either acetaminophen or ketorolac is given Q3 hours.
8
Sedation
Goal SBS as ordered
If patient’s SBS is above goal and unresponsive to comfort measures and PRN analgesia, start or titrate dexmedetomidine infusion:
- Dexmedetomidine 0.2 – 0.5 mcg/kg/hr IV. May be adjusted in increments of 0.1 – 0.3 mcg/kg/hr q30 minutes PRN agitation. Usual max dose 1.5 mcg/kg/hr.
Note: CICU attending approval required for use in neonates. Use dexmedetomidine cautiously in neonates (max 0.5 mcg/kg/hour). Watch for bradycardia.
9
Titrate opioid and sedative infusion(s) per the Nurse-Implemented Goal-Directed Algorithm (page 3)
10 days • Identify baseline WAT-1 score before first wean. • For most patients WAT-1 > 3 is consistent with iatrogenic withdrawal. o Goal WAT-1 to be determined by multidisciplinary team and based on patient’s baseline WAT-1. • Wean opioid by 10% of starting dose (dose at wean hour zero), then wean by that same amount Q24 hours (goal off in ~ 10 days). " v:shapes="_x0000_s1036"> 3 is consistent with iatrogenic withdrawal. o Goal WAT-1 to be determined by multidisciplinary team and based on patient’s baseline WAT-1. • Wean opioid by 10% of starting dose (dose at wean hour zero), then wean by that same amount Q12 hours (goal off in 5-6 days). " v:shapes="_x0000_s1035"> goal • Consider PRN rescue dose and hold one wean step. • Consider slowing the wean or starting intermittently dosed enteral medications (e.g., methadone, morphine or clonidine as appropriate) to facilitate weans. " v:shapes="_x0000_s1027">Nurse-Implemented Goal-Directed Sedation Algorithm
Regarding comment 2),
Regarding comment 2), expanding to BCH-Oakland would be possible as we take care of cardiac surgery patients there. We would be able to discuss the algorithm with the PICU teams at both hospitals to see if it would be appropriate for other patients.
For 3), the grant money would help us both more effectively implement the algorithm and also gather the important clinical outcomes data that require additional time and resources. In particular having assistance in data extraction from the EMR and statistical analysis would be important as we hope to eventually publish results of the intervention.
Excellent proposal! It's been
Excellent proposal! It's been years of work to pull together this multidisciplinary project. I'm looking forward to seeing it in action.
Super proposal! This is a
Super proposal! This is a tremendously important project in support of some of our most vulnerable and high risk patients.
I'm looking forward to this!
I'm looking forward to this! great work
Really looking forward to
Really looking forward to implementing this on our unit!
Such important work!
Such important work!
I look forward to the
I look forward to the implementation of this wonderful proposal! I am confident that a streamlined protocol like this will have a huge positive impact on the pain relief and comfort levels of our patients in the postop period.
I am extremely excited to see
I am extremely excited to see what comes of this important work!
What an amazing and important
What an amazing and important project. Thank you for bringing this to our patients and team.
Excellent work all - It's
Excellent work all - It's clear lots of thought and hard work went into making this proposal. Looking forward to its implementation!
Great project. Looking
Great project. Looking forward to seeing this go live.
Amazing multidisciplinary
Amazing multidisciplinary work! The patients and families will abosultely benefit from this new alogrithm!
Fantastic work! Can't wait
Fantastic work! Can't wait for this to go live!
Looking forward for the
Looking forward for the launch of this project ....
Very excited for this to
Very excited for this to launch on our unit!
Amazing work! Very excited
Amazing work! Very excited for this to launch.
Wonderful work on this
Wonderful work on this proposal. This is important work that will help improve our postoperative patients' pain management and increase interdisciplinary collaboration. We look forward to implementing this in the PCICU!
This is amazing. Looking
This is amazing. Looking forward to see this go live!!
I look forward to this going
I look forward to this going live - a great project. After much thoughtful interdisciplinary discussions, I am excited to implementing in the CICU.
It a great protocol to
It a great protocol to standardize practices and at the same time decrease duration of use of opioids as already established in other institutions. Looking forward to the implemetnation
So interesting!! Excited to
So interesting!! Excited to see this go live on our unit!
Excited to get started with
Excited to get started with this exciting endeavor!
This important proposal could
This important proposal could change the manner critically ill children's pain and sedation is managed and support lowest effective doses to potentially decrease IWS and support children's brain health. It could also ease parental anxiety surrounding their child's comfort after open heart surgery. The generous funding from the Caring Wisely funding will support nursing research/implementation science. Bedside nurses and Advanced Practice RNs could present their findings at national meetings. We anticipate this work to be successful and as previously discussed could be a model for other critical care settings within UCSF. The PICU at mission bay does a modified version of a comfort algorithm but does not include RN implemented version. This version will surely will be pleasing to RNs in clinical critical care throughout UCSF.
Can't wait to see this in
Can't wait to see this in action!
Looking forward to the go
Looking forward to the go live of the comfort algorithm.